Morgan, New Jersey

All about Morgan, New Jersey

Archive for February, 2011

Posted by Verne James on February 23, 2011

Morgan Memories – The Bridges of Cheesequake Creek

The Second “County Bridge” Over Cheesequake Creek.

The Second “County Bridge” Over Cheesequake Creek. Picture Post Card Courtesy of Joyce Elyea.

When I started this web site, I had no notion of how much of the effort would ultimately surround the topic of Cheesequake Creek.  At Morgan’s southern most boundary, Cheesequake Creek has had more influence on Morgan’s history than I had ever imagined.  Sadly, by the time any of us came into the movie, the creek’s glory days were long gone.    

As was stated in the September 2, 2009 posting, one of the biggest topics surrounding Cheesequake Creek is trying to traverse it.  From the early days of the Old Spye Inn, when people on stage coaches purported waited for low tide in order to cross it, getting across Cheesequake Creek presented a challenge.    

This posting is specifically about all the various bridges which have crossed Cheesequake Creek since the first bridge crossed it, I believe, some time in the mid to latter part of the 19th century.  Both major modes of terrestrial transportation, road and railroad, have had more than one bridge over time over the creek.  Presently there are three bridges over Cheesequake Creek, two are for automobiles and one is for trains.    

 
Garden State Parkway Bridges over Cheesequake Creek.

Garden State Parkway Bridges over Cheesequake Creek. Photo Courtesy of Microsoft’s Bing Search Engine and Pictometry International Corp.

The first bridge we’ll cover is the bridge closest to the creek’s headwaters and furthest away from Raritan Bay, the Garden State Parkway (GSP) Bridge.  In actuality the Garden State Parkway Bridge is made up of two bridges, one for each direction.  IMHO, this is the least interesting bridge to cross the creek – ever!  You’ll note that it has been so uninteresting to me that I had never even thought of taking a photo of it!  

From what I can tell by referencing one of my favorite web sites, HistoricAerials.com, physical construction of the twin GSP bridges started sometime in 1953.  Of course this was after the roadbed’s foundation was in place.  If you look at the 1953 aerial image on HistoricAerials.com you won’t see the bridges but you will see the extensive roadbed foundation of the GSP spanning the entire width of the creek.  You’ll also see barges on the actual creek which appear to be working on the bridge supports. Note that this area was newly dredged for the Parkway.  The creek appears to have been redirected to remove one of the creek’s jogs discussed in the early Chief Engineer of the US Army Corps of Engineers Report. Just south (below) the barges, you can see the original path of the creek.  In fact you can still see this artifact today. I do not know why they would have gone through the expense of redirecting the creek at that time since by then there wasn’t really any commerce originating from the headwaters of the creek. 

The 1954 HistoricAerials.com image shows completion of the two bridges with what appears to be two lanes in each direction.  When compared to today’s configuration, which features two six-lane bridges in both directions, the original bridges are located on the outside sides. Note that the portion of the Garden State Parkway just to the north of the Parkway Bridge passes directly through the previous site of the T. A. Gillespie Shell Loading plant and right through the area where the most intensive explosions occurred in October 1918 (see posting from October 4, 2010). 

The official opening ceremony of the Garden State Parkway was on October 23, 1954 though each section of the Parkway was opened as each section was completed.  Undoubtedly, the section over the new bridges and the rest of the Cheesequake Creek basin opened in advance of the official opening ceremony. 

In terms of passenger volume, between the three bridges currently in place over Cheesequake Creek, the GSP bridges accommodate the largest numbers of people with approximately 135,000 vehicles traveling over these bridges every business day.

Railroad Bridges    

The next bridge we will discuss now is the one which is currently the oldest.  In fact, this 98 year old bridge will turn 100 years old in early 2013.    

 
The Current NJ Transit Railroad Bridge Over Cheesequake Creek, Circa 1975.

The Current NJ Transit Railroad Bridge Over Cheesequake Creek, Circa 1975.

Situated just east of where Crossways (or Back) Creek merges with Cheesequake Creek, at the location where Flat Creek and Cheesequake Creek merge, is the present day NJ Transit Sherzer type single leaf rolling lift draw railroad bridge.  Unlike the current Route 35 bridge, which is a hindrance only to sailboats, this bridge can be a nightmare to any mariner coming from Morgan Marina, Brown’s Boat Yard or Lockwood Boat Works and heading east toward Raritan Bay.  Unless the bridge is in the open position, all but the very smallest of boats are not able to get past it.  Additional information on the construction – with references to articles from the South Amboy Citizen Newspaper, electrification and maintenance of this bridge can be seen in the Morgan-NJ.org posting from 22 January 2011.     

This is the second railroad bridge to occupy this spot.  The original 1870’s bridge, which was built for the then named New York and Long Branch Railroad, appears to have been located at exactly the same location as the current bridge and was of a very different type of design.      

 
Picture Post Card, Circa 1910.

Picture Post Card Close Up of Original Swing Bridge Over Cheesequake Creek and the Morgan Station, Circa 1910.

As shown in the above rare close up from a picture post card from the early 1900s, the original 1870’s bridge was a swing or pivot type of bridge.  The three walls of the swing railroad bridge can just barely be seen just to the left of the buildings making up the Morgan Station.  It looks like the two railroad tracks pass in between the three walls of the bridge and it also appears as if these walls were made of some type of metal.  Iron, maybe?  An aerial drawing of this bridge can also be seen in the below image.     

 
1879 US ACE Sketch.

Sketch from the 1879 US Army Corps of Engineers Survey of Cheesequake Creek (Dated 1882) Featuring, from Left to Right, the County Road Bridge, the Proposed Dam (Dark Line), and the Railroad Swing (Pivot) Bridge.

The 1880 Report of the Chief Engineer of the US Army Corps of Engineers briefly discusses the then relatively new railroad bridge, as follows:     

“… passes the railroad over the creek, has a pivot-draw, with a total span of 126 feet, and 2 openings of 40 feet in the clear. There are 3 masonry piers. The approaches on both sides are trestle-work.”     

I don’t yet have any specific info regarding how this specific swing bridge would have been opened in its day but most likely it would have been by hand.  There was probably a hand wheel connected by a vertical pole to a small gear which would in turn connect to a large stationary gear at the base of the bridge.  The bridge itself would have likely rested on a number of support wheels on a large pivot.  The bridge operator would manually turn the hand wheel to open or close the bridge.  Here is a 1902 New International Encyclopedia description of how this type of swing bridge would have functioned at that time.  While it mentions “steam-engines, gas-engines, electric motors, and hydraulic motors”, I really doubt any of those would have been present on the bridge over Cheesequake Creek in the 1870s.  When/if I find out otherwise, I’ll update this posting:     

“Swing bridges, in which the opening span swings horizontally on a turntable or vertical pivot carried by the pier supporting the span; …      

The most commonly used form of a drawbridge is the swing bridge. Generally the supporting pier, called the pivot pier, is placed under the centre of the span, which is always either a plate girder or a truss span. Sometimes, however, the pivot pier is located nearer to one end of the span than the other, in which case the shorter arm has to be counterweigh ted to balance the longer arm. When a swing bridge is open, the axis of the span is parallel to the axis of the stream; there are two open channels on each side of the centre pier and the ends of the span are swung clear of any support. When the bridge is closed the ends of the span are supported on piers. The longest swinging span ever constructed is that for the Interstate Bridge at Omaha, Neb., which has a total length of 520 feet. The Thames River Drawbridge, New London, Conn., has a swing span of 503 feet, and the Arthur Kill Drawbridge between Staten Island, N. Y., and the New Jersey mainland, has a swing span of 496 1/2 feet. The manner of supporting a swing span on the pivot pier so that movement is possible is quite simple. A casting at the centre of the pier carries a vertical pivot. Around this pivot as a centre is bolted to the pier a circular track having gear-teeth on the outer circumference. To the bottom of the span is attached a circular drum of the same diameter as the track on the pier, and at the centre of this drum is a socket which fits over the pivot on the pier. Between the bottom of the drum and the pier-track is placed a chain of rollers kept in position by radial arms running to the centre pivot. The span swings on these rollers, the centre pivot serving only to hold it in position or true to its centre. Movement is brought about by a vertical shaft running in bearings attached to the outside of the drum and having a gear-wheel at its bottom end which meshes into the gear-teeth on the outside of the fixed pier-track; the rotation of this shaft causes the drum to turn on the rollers and swing the span. In large spans two shafts are employed. The motive powers employed to operate the shafts are steam-engines, gas-engines, electric motors, and hydraulic motors. One modification of the centre pier swing span is the form already mentioned as having the pivot pier nearer to one end than the other; another is where the pivot is at the extreme shore end of the span while the other end is supported by a floating pontoon which swings with the span; another consists of two unequal arm spans with their pivot piers in the opposite banks, and the ends of the long arms meeting and locking over the centre of the channel.”     

       

The Current NJ Transit Railroad Bridge Over Cheesequake Creek, 2009.

The Current NJ Transit Railroad Bridge Over Cheesequake Creek, 2009.

The current Sherzer type single leaf rolling lift draw railroad bridge replaced the original swing bridge in early 1913.  Further information about the building of the current railroad bridge is contained in the January 22, 2011 posting.  For additional South Amboy Citizen articles specifically relating to the Railroad Bridges, see the January 22, 2011 posting.     

Road Bridges     

Though it might be the first bridge a mariner encounters when entering Cheesequake Creek from Raritan Bay, the current Route 35 draw bridge is not the “first” road bridge to have been located at the mouth of the Cheesequake Creek.  It appears in fact to be the fourth road bridge to have been situated at the mouth!     

First Bridge – Opened Sometime Prior to 1879     

 
1879 US ACE Sketch.

Sketch of the First County Road Bridge from the 1879 US Army Corps of Engineers Survey of Cheesequake Creek (Dated 1882).

A description of what I believe to be the first road bridge across Cheesequake Creek is also contained in the same 1880 US Army Corps of Engineers, Chief of Engineers Report referenced above.      

“There are two draw-bridges at the mouth of the creek; one, passing the county road, is about at right angles to the shore-line of the bay. It is a simple pile structure, and the draw is opened by running it parallel with the line of the bridge. It gives about 40 feet in the clear when the draw is open.”      

At this time, this is the only information I have on this bridge.  No diagrams.  No sketches.  No other descriptions.  As I said in the September 19, 2010 posting, I don’t know how “running it parallel with the line of the bridge” would have been accomplished in 1879.  Maybe one of the readers will be able to provide more info on this.      

This same bridge is also referenced on page 13 of a New Jersey law passed during the 1881 session of the One Hundred and Fifth Legislature of the State of New Jersey and Thirty-Seventh Under the New Constitution.      

“2. And be it enacted, that the board of chosen of freeholders of the county of Middlesex, are authorized to remove the present bridge across the mouth of Cheesequakes creek, to and across the new channel when the said new channel shall be completed by the United States government.”      

It seems like they were thinking of physically moving the first bridge from its original position over the original mouth to span the newly dredged channel.  Wonder if that is what actually happened?       

Second Bridge – Opened Circa 1898      

This does – forgive this one – bridge us onto our next topic, i.e., the second county road bridge across Cheesequake Creek.  This second bridge, which is shown on a picture post card at the very top of this Morgan-NJ.org web posting, appears to have a classically Victorian era design (at least it seems so to me).  According to the September 21, 1912 issue of the South Amboy Citizen, this “draw was erected fourteen years ago” which would put it at 1898.  While I don’t have much in the way of other information at this point regarding this classically elegant bridge, it was a swing/pivot type of bridge.  The Citizen article goes on to say:      

When the draw was erected fourteen years ago no one dreamed of the traffic it would be burdened with. At that time a half dozen wagons a day would be considered a rush, but now the travel over it by autos and wagons is continuous night and day. The old bridge is entirely inadequate to the traffic, and has become entirely worn out.”      

The full text of this article, and many others relating to the various bridges of Cheesequake Creek, are shown in full with links provided further down in this posting.  One of the articles states that this bridge was opened by hand! All of these South Amboy Citizen articles have been made available to all of us courtesy of South Amboy’s Sadie Pope Dowdell Library web site.      

This bridge, built with horses in mind, was modified some time in the early 20th Century, circa 1904/1905, to accommodate trolleys of the Jersey Central Traction Company.  It isn’t clear whether the structure of the bridge was reinforced but certainly the overhead centenary wires would have had to have been installed along with a means of allowing for the bridge to still swing open and closed.      

Third Bridge – Opened September 15, 1913      

The Third “County Bridge” Over Cheesequake Creek.

The Third “County Bridge” Over Cheesequake Creek. Picture Post Card Courtesy of Joyce Elyea.

Interestingly enough, while the abutment remains of this bridge and its southern approach road can still be seen on the bay side of the current Route 35 draw bridge, and my mother still speaks of how the first thing she would do when her family arrived at Morgan Beach from the city was to cross it to see her friend Betty Cady nearly 80 years ago, the first time I ever saw a photo of this bridge was in late 2010!      

This third bridge over Cheesequake Creek was a significantly different design than the bridge it replaced.  Instead of a swing (pivot) type of bridge, the design type selected for this third “County Bridge” was a double leaf bascule draw bridge.      

The South Amboy Citizen had a number of articles about this bridge.  Some of them discuss the accidental deaths of a few of the men who helped build the now long gone and nearly forgotten structure.  For a few decades, this bridge adequately served its purpose of connecting Laurence Harbor to South Amboy via Morgan.  From the time the bridge opened in 1913 until the Pratt Truss road bridge was built over the railroad tracks in 1924 (see October 9, 2009 posting), there was a sharp turn onto what is now Old Spye Road (see February 14, 2010 posting). From 1924 until this third country road bridge was replaced, the road climbed a man made hill in order to cross on the truss bridge over the railroad tracks to then cut across the  “Morgan Heights” neighborhood (later my neighborhood).      

Mr. Jack Jeandron, is the author of the excellent book “Keyport From Plantation to Center of Commerce and Industry”, and along with his terrific wife, is one of the key members of the Keyport Historical Society and Keyport’s Steamboat Dock Museum.  In my visit there during the summer of 2009, Mr. Jeandron recalled for me how this third Cheesequake Creek road bridge “used to be a draw bridge which sometimes required the car passengers to get out of their cars and jump up and down on the bridge in order for it to fully close!”  Can you image that today?      

This same bridge was purported to have played an interesting role during Prohibition days.  The stories tell of Rum Runners who used to zoom into the Cheesequake Creek tributaries with their cargo of illegal alcoholic products sometimes while in hot pursuit by the Coast Guard (Revenue Service?).  The Rum Runner’s high speed boats would acquire the then illegal cargo from a ship somewhere in Raritan Bay or the Atlantic.  The pursuing Government boats would lose them as these boats were too large to fit under the two Cheesequake Creek bridges (road and railroad).  The Rum Runners would easily zoom under the bridges and the Government boats wouldn’t be able to pursue them further until the bridges opened up.      

My Jesse Selover Elementary School and Sayreville War Memorial High School friend Frank was told by his father about underwater nets placed in Cheesequake Creek during Prohibition used to retrieve the hooch which was tossed out by the Rum Runners to sink.  This topic is a future posting so it won’t be expanded on here.      

A side view of this bridge can be seen in the December 30, 2010 posting about the Robert E. Lee Inn/Cady’s House of Sea Food.  To see a beautiful circa 1914 photo of the top of this bridge next to a Jersey Central Traction trolley, see page 13 of the excellent book “Street Cars of New Jersey - Atlantic Coast” by Mr. Joseph F. Eid, Jr.      

Mr. John Luhrs told me that this bridge was physically removed by iron workers who also worked for his father’s company, Morgan Yacht Basin, during World War II.      

 Fourth Bridge – Opened First Week of October 1943      

Morgan Bridge, 2009.
The Current Route 35 “Morgan Bridge” Over Cheesequake Creek, 2009.

Last but not least is the current Route 35 single leaf bascule draw bridge.  In the days leading up to World War II, forward looking War planners had determined that the then current draw bridge over Cheesequake Creek was not going to be able to adequately support the Army and Navy’s expected transportation needs in case of war (see the South Amboy Citizen article from October 4, 1940 below).  Three years later, directly in the middle of the US involvement in World War II, the new bridge opened.  Not only was it again a somewhat different type of bridge compared to its predecessors, it was also much higher which thus allowed for most power boats to pass underneath it without having to open it.  This came in handy for my dad when he had to take his Coast Guard boat to Henry Luhrs’ Morgan Yacht Basin, which was located between the two bridges, for service during the war.      

       

Two Couples on Morgan Bridge, Circa 1946.

My Aunt Anita, Uncle Ed (Mom’s Brother), Mother and Father on the Relatively New Morgan Bridge Over Cheesequake Creek, Circa 1946.

This bridge is discussed in one of the early Morgan-NJ.org postings, the one from September 2, 2009.      

This current bridge is the one I have known all my life as “Morgan Bridge”.      

        

South Amboy Citizen Articles Relating to the Various Road Bridges:      

December 23, 1911 – BIDS ON BRIDGE ARE TOO HIGH      

Bids were received at an adjourned meeting of the Board of Freeholders on Monday for the erection of a new bridge over Cheesequake creek, at Morgan. Three different sets of plans were bid on, and after being received were referred to the road committee.      

The following were the bids:      

Owega Bridge Co., Owega, N. Y. —      

For swinging bridge, $43,866;
For Scherzer lift bridge, $47,977.      

F. R. Long Co., Hackensack —      

For swinging bridge, $45,125;
For Bascule bridge, $46,603;
For Scherzer, $44,900.      

General Contracting and Engineering Co., New York —      

For Scherzer lift bridge, $47,856;
Bascule bridge, $47,857 and $55,155;
Swinging, $55,496;      

Snare & Triest, New York —      

Swinging, $54,300;
Scherzer, $55,900;
Bascule, $57,300.      

All the bids exceeded the estimate made by the board, and it is likely they will he rejected.      

April 20, 1914 – WORK SOON TO BEGIN ON MORGAN BRIDGE      

Now that Vice-President Brown, of the Jersey Central Traction Company, has arrived home from the South, where he has been overseeing the building of a new trolley line, it is expected that work will soon be commenced on the new bridge over Cheesequake creek at Morgan.      

The contractors and the Board of Freeholders are both very anxious to have the work started, but before doing so it was necessary that certain agreements be signed by the traction company in order that the company could be held to certain payments on the work. The company under its franchise will have to pay half the expense of the new bridge.      

The work cannot be commenced too soon as the present structure is in an unsafe condition. The easterly abutment is in very bad shape, and piling had to be driven to prevent it from falling down.      

If it is desired that the Board of Freeholders change the road so as to avoid the dangerous grade crossing over the New, York and Long Branch Railroad, the realty company through whose land it is proposed to run the road had better submit to the board’s plans, or said route will not be changed.      

Also in this newspaper issue is an announcement about the “Sinking of the Steamship Titanic”.      

June 15, 1912 – ODDS AND ENDS      

The contractors of the new county bridge at Morgan now show signs of getting busy. A work house has been erected convenient to the bridge.      

September 21, 1912 – Morgan Draw is Removed. Tide Assists Contractors in Removing It to Temporary Bridge Over Cheesequake Creek—Work Will be Rushed on New Bridge Over Creek.      

On Wednesday night the draw of the county bridge at Morgan was moved by the Owego Bridge Company to the temporary structure erected to be used while a new lift bridge is being constructed.      

The transfer was made by the use of two scows as pontoons. The old draw was previously strengthened by under pinning it with huge timbers, so that in its weakened condition there would not be any liability of its breaking in two. At low water the scows were moved under the draw one each side of the abutment, and then long and heavy pieces of timber were placed so that the ends running across the center pier reached each scow. Blocks were placed from these timbers to the draw and wedged tight. When the tide raised the draw was lifted and the scows with their burden were allowed to drift to the temporary bridge. The Iron cradle of the draw was then removed and securely fastened to the centcr pier. As the tide began to recede the draw dropped in its proper place.      

All boat traffic was stopped for the night, but on Thursday the draw could be turned and water traffic was resumed. Trolley passengers were transferred afoot over the structure, but automobiles were compelled to take the Cheesequake road in order to reach Keyport.  It is expected that by this Friday night, traffic will again be resumed over the creek.      

A number of people from this city witnessed the transfer, among whom was Freeholder Korr, who was present to look after the county’s interest.      

When the draw was erected fourteen years ago no one dreamed of the traffic it would be burdened with At that time a half dozen wagons a day would be considered a rush, but now the travel over it by autos and wagons is continuous night and day. The old bridge is entirely inadequate to the traffic, and has become entirely worn out. The freeholders did not decide on a new bridge any too soon, and it has been miraculous that the old structure has not collapsed from the heavy loads that travel over it. The work of clearing away the debre of the structure is now under way, and soon the concrete mixer will be busy on the foundation of the new bridge, and probably by the first of February it will be completed.      

October 5, 1912      

Sub-contractors are at work building the concrete abutments for the new county bridge at Morgan. It is stated that the New York and Long Branch railroad will commence work shortly on their new four-track bridge over the creek.      

October 12, 1912      

The contractor who has charge of the excavation for the easterly abutment of the new county bridge across Cheesequake creek should desist at once the emptying of surplus dirt along the bank of the creek where the tide as it ebbs and flows carries tons of it into the channel of the creek, and it will be only a short time when all so dumped will be at the bottom of the creek and lessen the depth of the water. Efforts are being made to deepen this creek by government appropriations, and no contractor should be allowed to undo what the government has already done.      

November 9, 1912      

Work on the new county bridge at Morgan would seem to progress slowy. The robins will return ere its completion, unless faster progress is made.      

December 7, 1912      

The work on the New York and Long Branch, draw bridge at Morgan is progressing rapidly, but the progress on the county draw is very slow.      

December 28, 1912      

Work on the county bridge over Cheesequake Creek has been delayed over a dispute with a water bill presented by the Jersey Central Realty Company to the contractors. It is claimed the bill is too much, and efforts are being made for adjustment.      

April 12, 1913      

Steel for the new county bridge in Morgan is expected to arrive next week, and then work will progress with a rush.      

July 12, 1913 – PROMISE TO COMPLETE BRIDGE IN FIVE WEEKS      

The contractors on the Cheesequake creek bridge have promised to complete the new bridge within five weeks or pay a penalty of $25 a day, for every day extended over that time. This agreement was reached at a meeting of the Board of Freeholders on Thursday, at which the matter of taking the contract out of the hands of the Owego Bridge Company was discussed.      

The delays of the contractors in building county bridges have given the Board of Freeholders no little concern and annoyance. Both the Woodbridge and Cheesequake creek bridges have been time usurpers, creating much public complaint. Owing to the fact that travel has to be taken care of there may be some excuse for delay on the Woodbridge creek bridge. On the other hand, there is no valid reason whatever for the delay on the Cheesequake creek bridge. The temporary bridge has taken care of the travel, and the contractors have not had any obstructions to delay them, but clear sailing all through and they cannot present any excuse for the delay. They should be brought to [Fines?]. Patience has ceased to be [virtue?] with the Board and they propose taking drastic action against the contractors. In this they will be supported by the public. This bridge could have been finished six months ago, if the contractors had pushed the work      

July 19, 1913 – CONTRACTORS REALLY GETTING BUSY      

Since the last “jacking up” by the Board of Freeholders, the contractors on the Cheesequake bridge seem to have really gotten busy and it now looks as though this work will be completed by fall. The contractor for grading and widening the approach has also started work, and has several teams filling in the causeway      

August 9, 1913 – Steamer Collins Gets Stays Caught in Bridge      

The freight and passenger steamer John B. Collins is having its troubles at the new county draw bridge at Morgan station. On Sunday, when coming down the creek the stays of the masthead were caught in the draw and considerable damage was done. On the following night the tug “Marion” left a scow filled with ballast near the bridge in a manner to interfere with the “Collins” again and a similar accident occurred;.Captain Collins claims that the bridge is not properly built in regard to the raising of the draw, and has reported the matter to the War Department.      

August 9, 1913 – STEPPED ON A LIVE WIRE.  William Webber Instantly Killed as 6,000 Volts of Electricity Passes Through His Body—Two Other Men Are Seriously Injured at Morgan.      

Coming into contact with a stay wire charged with 6600 volts of electricity, William Webber was instantly killed at Morgan on Wednesday, while John Webber and John Parker, who went to his assitance, met with severe injuries. Only for the very strong condition of John Weber’s heart, his injuries would have proved fatal.      

The accident occurred about 3 o’clock in the afternoon. William Webber, who was employed as a teamster by Michael Welsh, was hurrying toward the temporary county drawbridge, which had caught fire. He stepped on a support wire which had been accidentally charged with electricity, and with a loud outcry he wan seen rolling over the embankment. of sand which had recently been placed there to fill in the approach to the new bridge.  In falling he grabbed the wire with his hands. Not. thinking of any danger, and supposing that William Webber, had injured himself in falling, John Webber, who was working a scoop at tbe scene of the accident, ran to his assistance and grabbing William by the wrists, his body also became a conductor for the electricity and he fell unconscious. John Parker, an iron worker for the Owego Bridge Company, who was working on the new county bridge, received several very bad burns about the arms and wrists when endeavoring to rescue the men, and get the deadly wire out of contact with them.      

Hundreds rushed to the scene, among them Drs. E. Eulner and E. A, Meacham. No hopes were given for William Webber’s recovery, but by energetically working with John Webber, he regained consciousness and was taken to his home on Augusta street, in this city, later in the afternoon. He is still suffering greatly from the shock and is under the attendance of Dr. Eulner who says but for his strong physical condition, recovery would be impossible.      

The body of John Webber was brought to this city in the automobile of  J. J. Scully and after the arrival of Coroner Morgan, was removed to Stillwell & Mason’s morgue. On Thursday Undertaker Arrowsmith of Matawan took the body to the home nf Webber’s brother at that place.  John Parker, the iron worker who was injured, received medical attendance at his boarding place at Morgan, and from latest reports is getting along nicely.      

The deadly wire proved to be a loose support wire which, coming into contact with the main feed wire of the Middlesex & Monmouth E. L. H. & P. Co. rubbed off the insulation and became charged with 6,600 volts of electricity.  The victim of the unfortunate accident was no relation to John Webber, who was so seriously injured in going to his assistance.  Mr. Webber was employed as a diver by Michael Welsh and has two brothers and two sisters who reside at Matawan. The funeral took place at Matawan Friday afternoon.      

August 9, 1913 – Lock-Jaw Set In.      

John Parker an iron worker, who was so seriously burned by electricity at Morgan last week while trying to rescue the late William Webber is now in very serious condition, lockjaw having set in. On advice of his physician, Dr. Hardman, of Keyport, Mr. Parker was taken to the Monmouth Memorial Hospital at Long Branch on Thursday morning. His recovery is doubtful.      

August 16, 1913      

It is said that in removing the temporary railroad bridge over the Cheesequake creek at Morgan, many spiling were broken off. At low tide the ragged pieces of piling left can be seen sticking up in defiance of row or motor boats that might land on them. Motor boat owners are indignant that such dangerous objects should be left. Sooner or later some boat will strike them, and receive damage that may result in its sinking.      

August 23, 1913 – A COMMENDABLE ACT.      

The friends of the late John Parker on learning of his death, and knowing that he left two little children, aged 3 and 5 years, penniless, started a subscription toward his burial expenses and to relieve the children over the tide of dire necessity. The people responded liberally, and $131.75 was collected. For this commendable work credit is due to Henry M. Kline, of Perth Amboy, who collected $35.00 from the Morgan Beach colony; Edwin Furman, who collected $31.25; Mrs. Dora Ginter, .$3,00; and William Dalrymple, $62.50 from the people at large.      

August 23, 1913      

John Parker an Iron worker, who was so seriously burned by electricity at Morgan last week while trying to rescue the late William Webber, is now in a very serious condition, lockjaw having set in. On advice of his physician, Dr. Hardman, of Keyport, Mr. Parker was taken to the Monmouth Memorial Hospital at Long Branch on Thursday morning. His recovery is doubtful.      

August 23, 1913      

August 23, 1913 Citizen      

John Parker, an iron worker, who was taken from Morgan to the Monmouth Memorial Hospital at Long Branch suffering with lockjaw, died at the hospital on Friday night of last week. This makes the second death due to the touching of a live wire at the county bridge at Morgan.      

September 6, 1913      

It is expected that the new county bridge at Morgan will be thrown open to travel to-day or to-morrow.      

September 20, 1913      

The new county bridge at Morgan was opened to traffic last Monday [9/15/1913]. The trolley company has not connected their tracks as yet, but expect to be running over it in a few days.      

September 27, 1913      

On Tuesday [9/23/1913] the Jersey Central Trolley cars began running over the new county bridge at Morgan.      

October 11, 1913      

The temporary bridge over Cheesequake creek at Morgan is being removed this week.      

November 8, 1913 – New County Bridge – Ornament to Morgan      

One of the most prominent improvements made by the Board of Freeholders the past year is at Morgan. People from not only this State, but from other States as well, will appreciate the new bridge erected there, and the approaches thereto. The bridge is an ornament to the place. It is of steel, double lift draw, and much wider than the old bridge so that wagon and automobile traffic and trolley cars will not be delayed in passing over it. There is a walk for those on foot, and the danger that formerly existed of being run down by autos, or cars is thus eliminated. Electricity is used for the motive power in lifting the bridge. Each side of the road from the railroad to a point south of the bridge has been fenced, and the railings and posts painted white. The whole thing makes a neat improvement.      

The bridge tenders are receiving instructions in operating the draw, and the Board will probably complete arrangements this week for accepting the bridge from from the contractors.      

November 15, 1913 – COUNTY BRIDGE ACCEPTED      

Having received the approval of the War Department on the bridge over Cheesequake creek at Morgan, the Board of Freeholders on Friday formally accepted the bridge from the contractors, the Owego Bridge Company.  The county bridge tenders are now in charge.      

March 21, 1914      

Morgan Lambertson is building a house on the county bridge at Morgan for the accommodation of the tenders.      

October 4, 1940 – Hearing Will be Held On Proposed Morgan Bridge      

Set Date As October 22 At the Laurence Harbor Fire House
A hearing on plans for the erection of a new bridge over Cheesequake Creek at Morgan will take place at 10:30 A.M. Tuesday, October 23 in the Laurence Harbor firehouse, when representatives of the War Department will consider the plication of the state highway department for approval of the structure.      

The proposed bridge will be a high level structure about fifty feet south of the existing bridge. Plans call for the removal of the present bridge upon the completion of the new one. Also included in the project is the relocation of Stump Creek, further west to order to provide space for the erection of suans for the new bridge, and the digging of a channel between the present bridge and the New York and Long Branch railroad bridge. The channel will be 8OO feet in length, fifty feet wide and 5.4 feet deep at mean low water.      

October 8, 1943 – Military Needs Hasten Opening of Morgan Bridge. Local Man Has Been Bridge Tender Since 1909      

This week the new bridge spanning Cheesequake Creek on Route 35 at Morgan was opened to better serve Army and Nary units on New Jersey’s seacoast.  The patched-up old span necessarily continued in service with uncertainties regarding its continued safety in the transportation of heavy military equipment will be barred from further use. By-passed also will be the steep grade to the creek, a factor in several drownings when passenger cars crashed the open draw.      

The improvement represents an expenditure of $1,406,061. The $924,893 bridge contract is with the Fedhaber Pile Company of New York, and the roadway approaches costing $481,168 are being paved by the Weldon Contracting Company of Westfield.      

The new bridge of steel and concrete is 700 feet long. It has two 32-foot roadways on each side of a four-foot safety island and sidewalks of six feet. The lift span is 50 feet wide, but its 25-foot elevation over the creek will permit a greater percentage of boats to pass without halting highway users.  As a safeguard, however, James L. Hays of Trenton, Highway Department electrical engineer, has an auxiliary engine ready to provide power in the event of any failure of electrical equipment.      

War restrictions have prevented the completion of an adjacent southbound overpass at the Central Railroad and two-way traffic will continue temporarily on the present railroad overpass.  The concrete foundations have been set for full roadway width at the railroad but the deck cannot be built until the Federal Government releases the necessary materials.      

John M. Willet of 142 Grove Street, who has been bridge tender at the creek since 1909, estimates the higher level crossing will reduce by more than 75 per cent the delays for both boats and highway traffic.  At first he turned the bridge by hand, but the reconstruction in 1912 by Middlesex County and the old trolley company, power machinery was installed. Since the state obtained its jurisdiction in 1920 the growth in travel to the seashore resorts taxed the bridge beyond its rated capacity and continuous repairs have been made to prevent its total collapse.      

Many of the victims of the smash-ups at the old, narrow crossing were given first aid by Mr. Willett, and he was recently awarded the Highway Department Certificate of Merit for rescuing from drowning four occupants of an automobile that crashed the bridge when it was being opened for a passing boat.      

Posted by Verne James on February 15, 2011

Morgan Maintenance – Maintenance Repairs Begin on Route 35 Bridge Over Cheesequake Creek

 

The NJ Department of Transportation announced this on February 8, 2011.  Guess those living in Morgan, NJ already know it:

The New Jersey Department of Transportation (NJDOT) today announced that maintenance repairs have begun on the Route 35 lift bridge over Cheesequake Creek connecting the boroughs of Old Bridge and Sayreville in Middlesex County.

The floor beam repair work began earlier this week, requiring daily single-lane closures on Route 35 in either direction between 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday. All work is weather dependent and there is no weekend construction associated with the repairs. Construction is scheduled for completion by April.

NJDOT has plans for a major reconstruction of the existing structurally deficient Route 35 Cheesequake Creek Bridge, including the replacement of the bridge decks and electrical/mechanical systems. That project is currently in the design phase.

Variable message signs on Route 35 in both directions will be in place to alert motorists of the lane closures. Waterway traffic will not be impeded by the construction. Motorists are encouraged to check NJDOT’s traffic information website www.511nj.org real-time travel information.

Posted by Verne James on February 13, 2011

Simple List of Morgan Family Members Across the Generations

It isn’t clear whether anyone descending from the Morgan family that settled present day Morgan, NJ still has the last name of “Morgan”.  As far as I know, no family members still live in Morgan and none of those who live near Morgan, NJ appear to have that surname anymore.  I find that to be both ironic and kind of sad.

The purpose of this posting is to give an initial list of one son from each generation who had the last name of “Morgan”.  It starts with the first Morgan who came, reportedly in 1641, from Wales to Gravesend, New Amsterdam in “The New World” (present day Brooklyn, NY) and concludes with the last person named “Morgan” who was in the Morgan, NJ area that I am thus far aware of.

This list, which by no means the full Morgan family tree, will help when reading upcoming postings.  Discussions may get a little confusing because in the nine generations presented in this posting, there are four people named “Charles”, three named “James” and two named “Robert”. This list was chosen since most of what I know so far involves the individuals shown in the list. Please note that the son listed won’t always be the first born son and it doesn’t show wives or all children.  This list is the best attempt given what we thus far have discovered and has been compiled from a variety of sources.  In other words there are undoubtedly some inaccuracies.  Fortunately because this is the internet, if/when I come across more accurate information, I will come back to this posting and make the correction(s).

Here we go!

  • Carel “Charles”. 
    • Born: After 1620 in Newport, Wales.
    • Died:  1668 in Gravesend, New Amsterdam (present day Brooklyn, NY).
  • Charles, Jr.
    • Born: Circa 1648 in Gravesend, New Amsterdam.
    • Died:  1720 in Perth Amboy or Middletown, New Jersey.
  • Charles III.
    • Born: After 1683 in Flushing, NY.
    • Died:  1749.
  • James, Sr. (Captain).
    • Born: 1734.
    • Died:  1784.
  • James, Jr. (Major General).
    • Born:   4 January 1757.
    • Died: 14 November 1822.
  • Charles.
    • Born: 13 January 1808 in South Amboy.
    • Died:    1 September 1852.
  • James Rutus.
    • Born: 12 November 1833.
    • Died:  26 August 1898.
  • Robert E. Lee.
    • Born: 1878.
    • Died:  ?
  • Robert D. 
    • Born:  1911.
    • Died:   ?
  • Don’t know from this point!

I intend on providing the wider family tree over time as well as a bio write-up for each person as information becomes available.  In the mean time I would like to thank Ed Campbell, Sue Meyer, and Blair Case for their help with the generation of this initial generation list.

Posted by Verne James on February 13, 2011

Morgan Moment – Sheriff Charles Morgan Crosses Raritan Bay

I encountered the below December 1663 event in two separate sources which leads me to conclude that it actually did occur.  From the time the first Charles Morgan came to New Amsterdam in the New World from Wales (according to one source, his actual name was “Carel” or “Carle”), there have been at least five members of the Morgan family named Charles Morgan so its going to be easy to confuse them.  I believe the below event involves the first Charles (“Carle”) Morgan who, according to his great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great grandson Blair Case and other sources including The Register of New Netherland 1626-1674, was magistrate (Sheriff) of Gravesend, New Amsterdam (present day Brooklyn, New York) from 1657-1663.  Note that this Charles was the great-grandfather of Captain James Morgan, Sr.

The following is from page 5 of the 1903 book “William Bowne, of Yorkshire, England and his Descendants” by Miller K. Reading:

In 1663 a company of Puritans, living on Long Island, obtained permission of Governor Stuyvesant to settle on the banks of the Raritan.

A party of about twenty English, all or nearly all of whom had previously lived in the New England colonies but most of whom were then settled on Long Island, set out in a sloop from Gravesend, L. I., in December, 1663, and sailed across the bay to what is now Monmouth County, for the purpose of purchasing lands of the Indian sachems, with a view to settlement.

The men composing the party were John Bowne, William Golding, Richard Gibbons, James Holbert, Charles Morgan, Samuel Spicer, John Totman, Thomas Whitlock, and others — twenty in all. They made two or three more journeys from their homes on Long Island to the southern shores of the bay and finally purchased from the Indian chief, Poppemora and his people, the three “necks” of land known to the Indians as Newasink, Navarumsunk and Pootapeck. Having purchased the land of the Indians, “John Bowne, Richard Stout and three others, with their families, five families in all, came and made their settlement in the spring or summer of 1664, nearly a year before the [Monmouth] patent was issued.”

This same event also appears on pages 260, 261 & 262 of the 1875 book “East Jersey under the Proprietary Governments: A Narrative of Events Connected with the Settlement and Progress of the Province, Until the Surrender of the Government to the Crown in 1703” by William A. Whitehead.

Note that the original wording from the original the publication shown below remains intact even though it is not in alignment with 21st Century sensibilities.

9 Dec. We saw in the morning about 9 o’clock the English vessel coming down, on which we directly raised the anchor and sailed towards it; so as we did, arriving near her, we asked them from where they came; on which the skipper, Stoffel Elsworth, answered ‘from the Kil;’ asked what he had done there; answered, ‘he brought the English thither.’ We told him this was unbecoming, it was against our Government to act in this manner, and that he should answer for it; on which William Geldor cried out, “It.is well—it is well.” In the vessel were Charles Morgan, John Bon, James Holbert, John Totman, Sam Spyser, Thomas Wytlock, Sergeant Gybbings, from the first bay a man, named Kreupels-bos, one of Flushing, two from Jamaica, and a few more whom we knew not, to twenty in number. On the same day in the afternoon, returned about three, Hans the savage, whom we had dispatched on the eighth towards the Menesing Sachems who encamped it a considerable distance from the Raritan Kil; and Hans the savage conducted to us six or seven savages, who informed us, that the English, before Hans the savage came to them, had arrived there, and presented the savages with some wine, and two fathoms black seewant [i.e., wampum] and one white, after which they had asked them if they would sell to them some land; in the mean time [came] Hans the savage, when the whole was at an end, so that the English departed.

10 Dec. We departed again from the Raritan Kil, accompanied by two savages who were acquainted with the lands of the Menesings: we went down the bay, arrived at the kil which enters between Rensselear’s pier and the said point; met there again Stoffel Elsworth in his little sloop, and all the English sitting on shore near the kil; we went with our boat on shore, and went towards them along the strand; when we approached them we did see every one standing in arms. When the Sheriff Charles Morgan and John Bon advanced toward us, I asked them what was their business there, they answered, they went trading; we replied, if they went to trade, why then they had such a strong force with them? They said the savages were villians and could not be trusted, and therefore they went in such numbers; we told them, that we were informed they came to purchase lands from the savages, they answered, ‘we went only thither to see the land.’ We again told them that they ought not to undertake to purchase any land of the savages, as the largest part of it was already purchased by the Dutch. John Bon then asked me, under what government I presumed that they resided. I answered that they lived under that of the States General, and under that of the director General and Council here; to which he replied, why then are we not as well permitted to trade and explore land as ye? I answered him again, that they ought not to undertake to purchase any land from the savages, except that they previously obtained the consent of the Director General and Council; to which John Bon replied ‘it shall be well:’ then said Stoffel Elsworth, ‘I told them already the same, that they should not do it.’ Govert Lockermans told them then, ‘ye are a party of traitors as ye act against the government of the state:’ they said the king’s patent was quite of another cast. Lockermans asked ‘from where have ye your pass?’ they answered ‘from the Manhattans.’ Lockermans retorted, ‘ why do you act then against the state?’ to which Charles Morgan answered, ‘sek noty bey affet.” The English had their savage with them, who was of the Menesings, and had share in the murder of Mispath’s Kil, as our savage had informed us, whom we had taken with us in our sloop and carried hither, and his name was Quikems, living on the Newesing Kil, on the land called Townsing. We left then the English along shore and entered the kil about four miles along the west wall where the country was very mountainous; and the opposite side, as the savages informed us, was very poor, and some good land, old maize fields, and yet some plantations which I before explored with Corteljon: then we crossed the hilly parts about nine miles, and perceived by a sign on board, that Stoffel with his sloop and English had entered the kil. We remained before it during the night.

Posted by Verne James on February 13, 2011

Morgan Moment – Charles Morgan Purchases Plantation

Based on a few sources of information, one of them being his great-great-great-great-great-great-great grandson Blair Case, it appears that it was Charles Morgan III who purchased the property located on the north side of Cheesequake Creek and the west side of Raritan Bay which we know today as Morgan, NJ.  Charles’ son was Captain James Morgan and grandson was Major General James Morgan, Jr.  While I don’t yet – still – have the exact info on when the land was purchased, we can assume that it was well before Charles Morgan III died in 1750.

Also according to Mr. Case, Charles, Sr. (his great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great grandfather) originally settled in Gravesend, New Amsterdam (present day Brooklyn, New York) around 1641.  Charles Morgan, Jr. and family settled in Middletown, NJ some time around 1698. 

In the meantime, here is something I encountered while surfing the internet.  I believe it is a record of the will of the Charles Morgan III and references the original purchase of the land we know today as Morgan, NJ!  Hopefully soon we will all discover when the Charles Morgan III family actually moved there.

  • 1749-50. Jan 6. Morgan, Charles of Middlesex Co., yeoman; will of.
  • Children – Thomas, Charles,William, Danniel, James, Mary, Abigail, Sarah.
  • Plantation purchased of George Lesley, where Yose Soey formerly lived, on Cheasquake Creek.
  • Executors – sons William and Danniel and brother-in-law Seth Ellison.
  • Witnesses – John Bowne, Samuel Ellison. John Night.
  • Proved April 10, 1750. Lib. E, p. 380.

This mentions someone named “Yose Soey”.  According to other sources, “Yose” is an alias for “Joost”, “Jose”, “Joseph”, etc.  It is hard to follow how he fits in with the Morgan Family but obviously he knew them!  Guess this is also something we’ll figure out some day.

He is mentioned here (search for “Morgan”) and here (search for “Morgan”).  With such an unusual name, I wonder if the last name “Soey” might have anything to do with the two hills in Morgan we used to call “Big Suey” and “Little Suey”?